Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:15

Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
One year from World Cup opener, FIFA leaves questions unanswered on tickets and security - AP News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Why is Meghan Markle struggling with her Hollywood connections?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Mormon Wives Come Together for Season 2 Reunion -- But One Major MokTok Member Is Missing! - TooFab
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Diddy Trial's Most Disturbing Claims: Week Six Breakdown - TooFab
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What is your interpretation of the movie Rocky? What makes it a good film in your opinion?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.